Defamation Defence & SLAPP Claims

A defamation claim does not decide the merits

Defence of defamation and strategic lawsuits against public participation, with careful analysis of truth, good faith and procedural remedies

Confidential assessment call

The legal position

A substantial claim following a consumer review, opinion or disclosure of wrongdoing can cause considerable pressure. Some claims aim to exhaust the respondent financially and discourage legitimate public participation.

Fear alone should not determine settlement. An unnecessary apology or payment may damage the defendant’s position when a substantive defence exists.

Our legal approach

  1. Assess and rebalance the pressure

    Examine whether the claim has strategic or abusive features and whether early procedural relief or costs are appropriate.

  2. Build the substantive defences

    • Truth and public interest: establish the factual foundation and public-interest element.

    • Good faith: assess the applicable protected circumstances, including opinion, duty and a legitimate personal interest.

    • De minimis: examine whether the publication reaches the legally actionable threshold.

  3. Counterclaims and procedural responses

    Consider a supported counterclaim or other relief where the facts disclose wrongful conduct or abuse of process.

Defences that require careful examination

  1. Truth and public interest

    Establish the evidential basis of the publication.

  2. Protected opinion

    Distinguish factual allegations from opinion and assess the statutory conditions.

  3. Privileged publications

    Examine the specific protections for publications in defined official or judicial settings.

  4. Correction and mitigation

    Consider intent, correction and apology in the assessment of liability and damages.

After receiving a demand or claim

  • Preserve the original records and messages.

  • Seek advice before contacting the claimant or their representative directly.

  • Obtain timely assistance in preparing a reasoned response or defence.

The route forward

  1. Initial assessment

    Review the publication, its audience and the harm to reputation or privacy.

  2. Strategy development

    Choose the appropriate combination of evidence preservation, removal requests, negotiations and proceedings.

  3. Representation & action

    Act promptly and discreetly before the publisher, platform or court.

Frequently asked questions

Preserve the publication, address, time, reactions and available audience information. Reliable documentation allows urgent steps to be assessed without unnecessarily amplifying the content.

Arrange a comprehensive defence assessment

Matter